Archive for November, 2010

Yorkshire’s royal conections?

Kate-Middleton--shows-off-006

Kate Middleton shows off her engagement ring which originally belonged to Princess Diana.

Article courtesy of the Guardian, Leeds by Martin Hickes with a small contribution from me.

This article proved to be very popular with 12,500 hits in the first few hour of publication.

The impending Royal Wedding of Kate Middleton and HRH Prince William will introduce a strong Yorkshire bloodline into the Royal Family once again at the highest level.

Kate, who met William in 2001 while they were studying at Fife’s St Andrews University, was raised in the Berkshire village of Bucklebury.

Her businessman father Michael, however, was born in Leeds on June 23 1949 at Chapel Allerton Nursing Home and the Middletons have a strong Yorkshire lineage.

Her great-grandmother Olive was a member of the Lupton family, who were active for generations in Leeds in commercial and municipal work.

Francis Martineau Lupton, was one of four Lupton brothers who in the 19th century held some of the most important positions in the city.

Alderman of Leeds council

Francis was an alderman of Leeds council while brothers Charles and Hugh held the office of lord mayor. The fourth brother, Arthur, was a pro-vice chancellor of Leeds University.

Kate’s paternal grandfather Peter Francis Middleton was born in 1920, and became a pilot instructor marrying at the Parish Church, Adel, on 7 December 1946.

Further back in the Middleton line, her great grandfather on her paternal side was a solicitor born in Far Headingley. He lived in Roundhay.

Both of his fathers were solicitors with strong Leeds and Wakefield connections.

Her father Michael is descended from Sir Thomas Fairfax, a Parliamentarian general in the Civil War. The family rose to prominence as wool merchants during the 18th century.

His great-great-grandfather Frank Lupton expanded the family firm, ­William Lupton and Co, buying an old cloth mill and a finishing plant.

He and his wife Fanny, who had five children, lived in a Victorian mansion in the village of Roundhay, seven miles north of Leeds, employing six servants.

When Frank died aged 70, on May 20, 1884, he left his four sons – one died in childhood – £64,650 in his will – the equivalent of millions today.

It was Francis’s eldest daughter ­Olive – Michael’s grandmother – who created the union between the ­Lupton and Middleton families.

She married Noel Middleton, who came from a long line of successful and affluent Leeds solicitors, in 1914 and they had four children, Christopher, Anthony, Peter and ­Margaret.

The rich Yorkshire heritage will introduce a northern strain into the Royal Family not seen for generations at the highest levels.

‘Go back a long way to find Yorkshire connections with Royalty’

While the Duchess of Kent is from Yorkshire, and the Earl of Harewood and the Lascelles family have Yorkshire links, we have to go back a long way to find any Yorkshire connections at the highest pinnacle of the Royals.

Author and historian Peter Algar, from Leeds, says:

“Even if we go back to the War of the Roses in search of a strong Yorkshire link with our monarchs, we run into difficulties. It is a popular misconception, but the House of York were all Southerners, to a man.

“Richard III (when he was Duke of Gloucester) inherited some of the Neville lands at Middleham. He was the only one that spent any time in the north.

“The House of Lancaster were the northerners, John of Gaunt (descendant of Edward III) being the ruler of the Palatine of Lancaster, which covered large parts of Yorkshire. This was home rule for the north and not under the king’s direct jurisdiction.

“Our true ‘Yorkshire’ kings and queens date back to Viking times, other than that the links are relatively tenuous.

“Richard III was a Northerner by adoption. He built up his northern landholdings when he was governor of the North, swapped Chirk Castle for Skipton Castle and could rely on the support of the soldiery from York and the Ainsty. He was popular with a lot, but not all, of the men of the county.

“After Elizabeth I died, I believe that one of the Yorkshire-based Clifford family had a strong claim to the throne, through their marriage links to the ‘Nut-Brown Maid’, Henry VII’s cousin.

“There are not many precendents, if any of a princess – as Kate Middleton will become – with strong Yorkshire links going on to become queen.

“There was a Middleton family in Ilkley, West Yorkshire in Medieval times. They took on the name Middleton, as they owned that region of Ilkley. There is an effigy of one of the Middleton family in Ilkley Parish Church, a knight, I believe, and if I’m not mistaken their coat of arms is displayed in the church, along with other leading families of the town.

“The Middletons were a big land-owning family in Ilkley and my ancestors, the Bollings used to rent a large tract of land from them known as Bolling farm, which is now the site of Ilkley Town Hall.

“Unfortunately for the Middletons, they held onto the old Catholic faith, and lost land and privileges as a consequence. It may well be that these people are distant ancestors of Kate’s family, due to the near proximity.

“The Lupton side of her family from Leeds had definite Ilkley connections as I have a record of them visiting the Bolling family home at Wheatley Hall in Ben Rhydding as summer boarders in the late 1700′s (from Ilkley Ancient and Modern, by the Reverend J Horsfall Turner). Maybe that’s when the Luptons first met the Middleton’s?

“As for the last queen with Yorkshire blood, we probably have to go back to Queen Cartimandua all those years ago, in the first century, when she was queen of the Brigantes. For Yorkshire folk, Kate is certainly of great significance.”

* Yorkshire’s last major royal connection with a monarch is believed to have been in 1535 when Henry, the 11th Lord Clifford converted Skipton Castle into Royal Apartments for his son’s bride. She was Lady Eleanor Brandon. Her mother was Mary Tudor, daughter of Henry VII, sister of Henry VIII and widow of the French king Louis XII.

Guest blogger Martin Hickes is a Leeds-based writer.

A summer’s evening is as long as a winter’s day

Dintingdale Nov 2010
“A summer’s evening is as long as a winter’s day” was a quote from one of the Parliamentarian Generals who decided that the evening would be well spent engaging the Royalist Forces, during the battle of Marston Moor. Dashing Prince Rupert and the Earl of Newcastle were put to flight and the day, sorry evening, was won by the Roundheads. “Boo” I say to this but I will not let my feelings come into this as the battle I was concerned with was from an earlier Civil War, which we now call the Wars of the Roses.
What am I talking about? Well, my colleagues and I decided that we would take a guest to two battlefields in one day, due to their close proximity.
The morning was spent on a tour of the battlefield at Towton and then after a splendid lunch of game cassoulet at the Crooked Billet we upped sticks and moved on to Long Marston, near Tockwith.
As I said, I was more interested in the first battle. The reason? Well, one thing about the Towton conflict that does not sit well with me is the outcome of the conflict at Ferrybridge, the day before the main battle at Towton. Why did John Clifford sacrifice his life in such a way, leading 500 brave men against the entire Yorkist host?
My colleagues on the walk were Graham Darbyshire – in my opinion, the man with the best knowledge of the Towton topography and Dave Cook – ex soldier of the Inniskilling Dragoons and military historian, a chap who could help debate troop deployments.
The exam question then, “was how did Clifford get into such a pickle?” Just what was the Lancastrian Commander, Somerset, doing letting his most talented general, John Clifford, take this seemingly suicidal task on?
As with most of the conflicts of this period, there is precious little you can glean from the original source documents and secondary accounts are often written hundreds of years after the event and are by their very nature unreliable. Just look at the recent discovery that the Battle of Bosworth was in the “wrong” place. That was down to earlier historians being too reliant on the secondary accounts of the battle.
Clifford was considered to be the most lusty of the trio of Somerset, Northumberland and himself and it was agreed that he should take the fight to the Yorkists at Ferrybridge – that much we do know.
He took with him his crack light cavalry troop “The Flower of Craven”, 500 hard-riding, hard-fighting men – that much is documented.
He was successful in his mission of causing mayhem at the crossing at Ferrybridge – all seem to agree on that subject.
The poor chap perished with an arrow in his throat from Lord Fauconberg’s pursuing force of mounted archers whilst removing his gorget to slake his throat – what a way to go.
If you visit the spot where he was killed, a little spot called Dintingdale, to the east of Saxton, you get a great view of the topography and can look over your shoulder to see where he came from, after the Ferrybridge encounter, today’s cooling towers being clearly visible. The view to the front is the ridge where the main battle was to be fought the next day. If you look at the picture, you can see the windswept hawthorn tree, known as the battle tree, which was said to be the epicentre of the battle on Palm Sunday. The day before however, there would have been Lancastrian outriders there, watching for the advance of their Yorkist enemies. (Incidentally, Graham Daybyshire reckons that Dintingdale got it’s name quite literally as it was the dint in the dale. Far-fetched? Well, not really when you consider that there used to be a “Bare-arsed Farm” nearby, named by the locals because it was situated in the path of the cold northerly winds. The prudish Victorians changed its name to a more modest “Cold House Farm” – such a shame).
Anyhow, back to the story, if the Lancastrians had a good view of the route that Clifford was taking on his way back to the main lines, and saw the Yorkist in hot pursuit, why the heck didn’t they do something about it?
Historians have long argued that events happened so quickly that the Lancastrians would not have had chance to mount a rescue mission. To reinforce this argument, we saw a lady mounted on a fine dapple-grey mare, exercise her horse across the fields at Dintingdale right before our eyes. It soon ate the miles up across the terrain, illustrating how effectively a troop of mounted archers could close in on their prey.
My issue though, is that you would not let your most talented general get into this position. If Somerset valued his talents, he would surely have made a contingency plan to supply forces to help Clifford, having pulled off such a fantastic coup at Ferrybridge, retreat in an orderly manner. Surely, there were Lancastrian scouts reporting back on every Yorkist movement and Somerset would have been eagerly awaiting news of the success or otherwise of his engagement.
I think it was Harry Gration that said, “You can always tell a Yorkshireman……but not much” and that was why it was so good to have the 3 of us debate this, both on the spot and in the pub over a pint of beer afterwards.
Dave took the view that Clifford had over-extended his remit. That his instructions were to cause mayhem at the bridge and then high-tail it out of there while the Yorkist forces were in confusion. This would have bought the Lancastrians extra time so that they could consolidate their strong defensive position at Towton. Instead, bolstered by his initial success, Dave thinks that Clifford tarried too long, engaged in the second skirmish with Warwick and only beat his retreat when Lord Fauconberg was already in pursuit from the crossing at Castleford. Somerset was already in what was thought to be a strong defensive position. He wasn’t going to move from there. Why should he worry what was going on down the road?
Graham was of a similar view to me. Was there some animosity in the Lancastrian command? Why did Percy not play a more prominent role? After all the battle was being fought on his ancestral lands. Was there jealousy between Somerset and Clifford to the extent that Somerset deliberately let this upstart Clifford perish so that he could get him out of the way?
550 years after the battle, we can only speculate. One of the latest theories is that Ferrybridge and Towton was a rolling battle and not two separate incidents. Recent evidence has come to light of finds from two Burgundian hand-guns, just to the east of Dintingdale. These were mercenaries hired by the Yorkists so, just why were these fragments found here and not further north where the main battle was fought? Another unanswered question.
What still niggles me is why Clifford felt safe enough to remove his gorget to take a drink, within the range of an enemy bowman? He was a very experienced soldier and would have known the consequences of such an action. Surely, some form of treachery is at play here?
I may not have got any closer to the truth but I had a thoroughly good day out with some some like-minded people and feel all the richer for it. I won’t stop though, until I find an answer that puts my mind at rest.